Questions and Answers:

If you would like to watch a fun 10 minute video that covers a lot of the nationality information, click here: https://youtu.be/DMoAxTWCn9Y

1. Are you “licensed?”

“Licenses” do not exist. I’ll explain in detail…

For the purposes of the following information, “BAR Card,” “lawyer,” and “attorney-at-law” all mean the same thing. Also the terms “ens legis,” “business,” “sole proprietorship” and “franchise” pretty much mean the same thing as well.

If you hire a BAR Card, you are a “client.” A client, by definition from Corpus Juris Secundum, is defined as: “one who applies to a lawyer. Clients are also called ‘wards of the court.’”

“Wards of court” are defined as “infants and persons of unsound mind.”

When you become a “ward of the court,” you become, essentially, PROPERTY of the court. A BAR Card is essentially an administrator of the court’s property. This is because an attorney-at-law is an “officer of the court.” The client is not the top priority to an attorney-at-law… the top priority is the wishes of the court.

A BAR Card lawyer “represents” you, which means they stand on your behalf because you are incapable of doing so. You are incapable of making decisions for yourself (which is why you also waive your rights and cannot claim your rights when you take on a BAR Card as a “client.”)

A BAR Card lawyer is called an “attorney-at-law.” A non-BAR attorney is called an “attorney-in-fact.” Look these terms up for yourself online.

The term “lawyer” typically refers only to an attorney-at-law, so we try to be specific and only use the term “attorney” or “attorney-in-fact.”

An “attorney-in-fact” is a non-BAR attorney that acts as your “agent.” Everyone has the infinite ability to contract and an attorney-in-fact is a contract-based attorney that has the ability to do specific things on behalf of another party, as though they essentially ARE that person. Essentially, it is simply a better option than being a “client” because the Power of Attorney that is written between you and your AGENT, lays out all the particular rules of the relationship and allows you to reserve all your rights.

An attorney-in-fact can be used for a son or daughter to take over a dying mother’s estate, it can be used for convenience… for example working on behalf of a busy celebrity, etc. There are many uses but many people give away power of attorney without completely knowing all the power that is contained in that activity (for example, you give power of attorney to the DMV and they become your attorney-in-fact without you totally realizing it). You should be careful of what you sign to make sure you don’t do this.

You can type “attorney-in-fact” into the internet and find plenty of information. You will also find that you do not need any special qualifications or “licenses” to be one.

If you are a child or you are legally retarded (meaning you cannot handle your own affairs on a day-by-day basis), you hire an attorney-at-law and become a client. If you are coherent and an adult, you hire an attorney-in-fact or “agent.”

As an attorney-in-fact, our job is to essentially assist you in PRESENTING (not re-presenting) yourself. By operating in this manner, you become exponentially more powerful as both a plaintiff or a defendant.

It’s important to keep in mind the definition of “represent” is: To appear in the character of; personate; to exhibit; to expose before the eyes. To represent a thing is to produce it publicly. Dig. 10, 4, 2, 3; In re Matthews, 57 Idaho, 75, 62 P.2d 578, 580, 111 A.L.R. 13. To represent a person is to stand in his place; to supply his place; to act as his substitute. Plummer v. Brown, 64 Cal. 429, 1 P. 703; Seibert v. Dunn, 216 N.Y. 237, 110 N.E. 447, 449. The definition, itself, indicates there is two parties. So a person cannot “represent themselves.” That is a hilarious oxymoron, just like the hit piece term “sovereign citizen.” You can only PRESENT yourself… unless, of course, they are using specialized definitions of “you” and “yourself” when you are asked if “you are representing yourself.”

Black's Law 4th Edition does a great job of delineating the differences between an attorney-at-law and an attorney-in-fact: -Public attorney. A name sometimes given to an attorney at law, as distinguished from a private attorney, or attorney in fact. “Public” could be defined as “anything in the court or interfaced with the court directly where a person would be REpresented within the confines of an official court proceeding. This would include hearings, docket items, an appearance, etc.” Whereas “private” would be defined as “anything involving an individual’s life outside of official court proceedings. This would include even things like discovery or a meet and confer, as long as they are not interfaced directly into the court beyond a declaration that the events took place.”

Each and every corporate “State” has a “Power of Attorney Act” that clarifies and defines the usage of contracts to create “attorneys-in-fact.”

A Power of Attorney is, essentially, a contract which allows a “person” (which can include corporations, types of trusts, etc) to allow another “person” to operate on their behalf for various reasons that are specified in the Power of Attorney.

Even the American Bar Association (shockingly) has an excellent article on the subject of attorneys-in-fact at: https://www.americanbar.org/groups/real_property_trust_estate/resources/estate_planning/power_of_attorney/

I refer to myself as an attorney-in-fact to keep it specific, but the two designations explained above are VERY different and VERY important. Not all legal relationships are the same and you should be very careful to only work with non-BAR professionals. BAR cards are not “licenses,” they are simply membership cards into a private membership association called the BAR. A “license,” by definition, means: permission to do something that would otherwise be considered not allowable. If you ask an attorney-at-law for his “license,” he will promptly present to you his private BAR membership card. They typically don’t have a clue.

A Power of Attorney, especially a limited one, protects your rights and allows you to have a higher chance of success in the court system. You explicitly state in the Power of Attorney that you are reserving all of your rights (which we help you do). The clearer and more transparent the contract becomes, the less chance there is of a degradation of your rights or standing can be assumed (only that of which is uncommunicated can be assumed).

****

A State cannot exclude a person from the practice of law or from any other occupation in a manner or for reasons that contravene the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - SCHWARE v. BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS, 353 U.S. 232 (1957)

Also, Sims v. Ahrens, 167 Ark. 557, 271 S.W. 720 (1925), explained how the practice of law is an “occupation of common right”

****

For additional context on the purpose of an “attorney,” the definition of “attorn” from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition is critical:

1. To recognize or bring about a transfer, especially of property
2. To transfer (something) to another
3. To turn, or transfer homage and service, from one lord to another. This is the act of feudatories, vassals, or tenants, upon the alienation of the estate

2. Are you a member of the BAR?

Absolutely not, nor will I ever be. All the above information in point #1 applies the same to this question. The BAR is a private club that sets the legal standard for PUBLIC activities as regards to the court. Everyone assumes that the BAR issues “licenses,” when it most definitely does not. Admission into the BAR is the exact same structure as admission into the tax code: COMPLETELY VOLUNTARY AND UNNECESSARY. It is entirely optional and based off VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE.

The only use of a BAR membership is to represent infants and the mentally/emotionally/physically disabled. None of which I do or want to do.

3. Are you practicing in STATE OF CALIFORNIA?

In 8 USC 1101(a)(23), the tremendous power of naturalization is revealed: The term “naturalization” means the conferring of nationality of a state upon a person after birth, by any means whatsoever.

A “person” can be a corporation or organization. So I can confer the nationality of absolutely any corporate “State” on my sole proprietorship, BRANDON JOE WILLIAMS®, as much and often as I want. This is how I can legally operate in all 50 “States.”

I am without the “United States” at all times as per 28 USC 1746 and operate solely as a national (as per 8 USC 1101(a)(21)) of the nation called The Amnesty Coalition. The definition of “national” is: “a person owing permanent allegiance to a state.”

I am a foreign friend of the courts and I operate in the courts using my franchise, BRANDON JOE WILLIAMS®.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA is a public corporation that is physically located in the District of Columbia. I have never been a resident, nor domiciled, in the corporation called United States. I have also never been a resident nor domiciled in the business called STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

You can view the Dun and Bradstreet Business Directory listing, proving that it’s just a business, for STATE OF CALIFORNIA here: https://www.dnb.com/business-directory/company-profiles.state_of_california.1a94ea44c86f736530ae2159b54677ff.html

“STATE OF CALIFORNIA” and “state of California” are two entirely different nations with two entirely different Constitutions. The “state’s” Constitution comes from 1849 while the “STATE’s” Constitution comes from 1879. I went down to the local library to get a copy of the 1849 one because I couldn’t find it online. Have a look if you would like: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/oeurk77btqeufk5ib0k0f/Original-1849-Constitution-of-the-unincorporated-California.pdf?rlkey=fbf8ocfl8nzopl590tu9t4xnq&st=708sx9c7&dl=0

4. Are you an officer of the court?

Absolutely not, nor will I ever be. I am a foreign friend of the court. Only BAR members are officers of the court. BUT THIS DOES NOT MEAN THAT I DO NOT CARE ABOUT THE WELL-BEING OF THE COURT OR THAT THE COURT IS MY ENEMY.

5. How is it legal for you to give legal advice?

As I have already explained, in depth: I do not reside or domicile in the United States as it is defined in 28 USC 3002(15) or how it is described in UCC 9-307(h). I am not a US citizen.

I also do not reside in the business called STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Thus I am not within the jurisdiction of the “State” or “Federal” Codes. Only my ens legis/sole proprietorship is ever located in any of those areas.

I am an unincorporated “freeman” of the “Union,” as quoted from the Honorable Mr. Justice MILLER, as he spoke on the difference between state citizenship and Federal US citizenship in the Supreme Court case: The Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. 36 (1873). This means that things like the California “Business and Professions Code” is entirely irrelevant to me.

But, amazingly, I have searched for the definition of “practicing law” and there appears to be no actual official definition. So I went on a bit of a search trying to figure it out… if a “license” is “permission to do something unallowable” and BAR Cards “administer the property of the court,” then I think I have figured out the definition of the term “license to practice law.” The definition would be “permission to administer the assets of the court.” This would only apply to infants and persons of unsound mind!

If there is ever a complaint or bill of exchange/draft issued to my sole proprietorship for “practicing law illegally,” I would simply do a qualified/special indorsement on the bill and tender it back to perform on the instrument. Then I would immediately spring into action to counterclaim or litigate to effectively attack the source of such a ridiculous accusation. I would charge that accuser with a trademark violation for manufacturing a negotiable instrument using my registered trademark, without permission. (I don’t administer assets of the court and I don’t operate in the public on behalf of clients, so this entire “charge” would be absolutely asinine).

Secondly, I operate through the infinite and free capacity of contracts. Taking a look at 15 USC 1 shows that NO ONE (including the government) may meddle in contractual agreements.

Article 1, section 10 of the Constitution states (taking out a lot of the words of the quote because it’s a lot to look at and clear up. Look it up if you want the whole text):

“No State shall … pass any … Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts …”

NO STATE MAY INVOLVE THEMSELVES IN ANY LAW IMPAIRING THE OBLIGATION OF CONTRACTS.

Through the contractual agreement of a Power of Attorney, I'm able to legally contract with anyone I want and in any way I want. As I mentioned before, this is called an “attorney-in-fact.” I have additional protections as well because my Power of Attorney contracts are actually international contracts, not domestic ones.

You also have the VERY clear aspect of 42 USC 1981:

(a)Statement of equal rights
All persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no other.

(b)“Make and enforce contracts” defined
For purposes of this section, the term “make and enforce contracts” includes the making, performance, modification, and termination of contracts, and the enjoyment of all benefits, privileges, terms, and conditions of the contractual relationship.

(c)Protection against impairment
The rights protected by this section are protected against impairment by nongovernmental discrimination and impairment under color of State law.

*****

I am a foreign diplomat of my own nation called The Amnesty Coalition. I am an "internationally protected person" as per 18 USC 112.

I am the king of a foreign government, as it is defined in 18 USC 1116(4)(A).

Any attempt to attack my right to practice as an attorney-in-fact will be met with a charge of international terrorism as well as intimidation of a diplomat on diplomatic mission. International terrorism, with myself being an internationally protected person, would be covered under 18 USC 2331(1)(C). Intimidation of an internationally protected person would be covered under 18 USC 112.

Many “States” even have special protections, in their Power of Attorney Act, that I can use to press charges for any difficulties that I run into involving getting my fiduciary duties completed.

6. What STATES/states do you practice in?

I do not personally practice in any of the incorporated “STATEs” and only practice in the unincorporated states. I practice freely in all 50 unincorporated states, where there is no jurisdictional risk for my not having a BAR card to be an issue in the courts.

My sole proprietorship practices freely in all incorporated “STATEs” through the power of naturalization.

7. Do you have experience in actual litigation?

Please view our Current and Previous Litigation page for more information on all the cases we are currently working as well as all previous cases. Upcoming cases are typically not talked about until filed and stamped by the court. By the time the case is ready to be served is when I post it on this website.

8. If there are more “lockdowns” or other instances of gross government overreach in a felony-attempt to violate open commerce, will you assist in those situations?

I would be honored to. Each individual felony violation of 15 USC 1 is up to a $100,000,000 penalty. I’ll be very happy to take billions from the State. This will also be countless felony violations of 42 USC 1983/42 USC 1985/42 USC 1986. This will be like winning the Power Ball Lottery.

9. Are you supporters of law enforcement?

YES! Enthusiastically. The problem of law enforcement is a very simple problem of a lack of clear and precise definitions. There are plans in the works to take some of the donations given to us and build out really amazing (and funny!) free educational material for law enforcement. Law enforcement wants to have law and order, and for that we salute them.

The basic purpose of the Sheriff’s Office is “to keep the private populace calm, orderly, free of terror, etc. To improve the overall relations in the society by preventing and snubbing those who harm and annoy others and to pave the way and assist those who improve the society by their actions. To exercise the superior jurisdictional authority in an effort to keep the society productive, growing and cohesive.”

The basic purpose of the police is: “To grease and improve the lines and flow of commercial activity by assisting and regulating commercial flow.”

The basic purpose of the courts is: “to take the information collected for them and presented to the court to locate the truth and publish it. This would include the elimination of the sources of lies.”

These basic purposes are simply missing basic definitions (and their COMMERCIAL implications) such as:

1. Motor vehicle

2. Traffic

3. Commerce

4. Corporation

5. Driver

The list goes on and on.

Anyone complaining about law enforcement should, in the same breath, be willing to produce the necessary educational material to assist all law enforcement in doing a better job.

Law enforcement wants to feel that they are doing something of value for the society by providing a structure. This is entirely possible by a simple adjustment in definitions - no different than adjusting an engine to make sure it runs right.

Law enforcement was never supposed to REPLACE our desire and ability to defend ourselves. Law enforcement was never supposed to be the sole source of FORCE in the society. It was supposed to be a supplementary arm of the society that assists us in having a group of overwhelming force to suppress and eliminate elements of the society that are deemed as dangerous or parasitic to the society as a group.

Law enforcement is an important and appreciated aspect of society. Thank you for your service.

10. Are you political or a supporter of politics?

Absolutely not. Politics is often weaponized in today’s world and needs a major cleanup. Politics often comes down to creating contention in the society in order to control the society. We do NOT support the current political climate in America and we believe it needs a major cleanup. We are not supporters of either “side” of the political equation, regardless of what it may seem, and we do not donate or vote for either “party.” Both parties lie and do not take the time to educate you on the most basic of aspects such as:

1. How the “United States” is a corporation located in the District of Columbia

2. How you can file another kind of passport regaining all your rights as an American

3. How the tax system and the BAR are both entirely voluntary and optional

4. Basic knowledge of securities and the monetary system of America

5. How you think you have a “motor vehicle,” while that actually means you are in a commercial activity

6. THE BASIC DEFINITIONS OF WORDS

We believe that any “political” entity that is not talking about and sharing the above information, for the benefit of mankind, is not a friend of mankind and has particular and specific motives… often uncommunicated. ALL OF THOSE MOTIVES STEM FROM A SCARCITY MINDSET AND WE DO NOT SUPPORT OR CONDONE SUCH BEHAVIOR.

We are entirely at peace in relation to 18 USC 11, but we will not and cannot ignore or sugar-coat the dangers that our current political scene openly displays to us. We are at peace, but we also do not kiss snakes.

11. Are you “anti-government” or some kind of anarchists? Do you believe that the corporation called “United States” should be eliminated?

Not necessarily. The Federal corporation has a lot of actually really wonderful information and codification. In the terms of the commercial world, the structure they have created is quite overcomplicated, but I actually really appreciate the corporation’s efforts towards the codification of commercial activity.

Very simple adjustments can be done to shift the actions of the Federal corporation into something actually quite functional:

1. The natural elimination of the 14th Amendment (more information about this subject is written in a lower point of this page, down below)

2. The DMV being transparent about the fact that a “motor vehicle” is a commercial activity and that “registration” is the “Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Program” of 34 USC 12611. THE PROGRAM IS VERY CLEAR THAT PEOPLE ARE SUPPOSED TO KNOW THAT THIS PROGRAM IS VOLUNTARY AND WAIVES ALL THEIR RIGHTS.

3. Federal Reserve Notes are securities and fall under the same laws of all other securities.

Etc, etc, etc.

THE ENTIRE GOVERNMENT IS NOT FUCKED. But there are a few specific points that, if adjusted, would handle a vast majority of the problems we see in this country.

We are NOT anti-government. We are “let’s make adjustments to the government to make it more beneficial to us all as a country. Let’s clarify the jobs of the government and make sure that the government is something that we would LIKE to have and that WE ARE PROUD to have.”

You don’t have people running around complaining about the Fire Department. WE MAKE CALENDERS OF THE MEMBERS OF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT HALF-NAKED. WE PRACTICALLY WORSHIP THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. Because they simply do their job and they are valuable to the society at large.

We simply need to clean up the other areas of government in order to put the other areas into that same condition.

(Imagine the day we do half-naked calendars of our politicians!)

WE ARE NOT “ANTI-GOVERNMENT” AND WE ARE NOT “PRO-GOVERNMENT.” We simply want to be the catalyst to create a new thought process where AREAS THAT WE ARE NOT HAPPY WITH ARE CORRECTED FOR THE BENEFIT OF EVERYONE.

There is nothing “anti-government” about that and we are not hostile to the government at-large.

“The government” and “politics” are two very different things. We are not “anti-government” but we are, ultimately, “anti-politics.” The reason is because politics is pretty bad and needs a MAJOR overhaul.

“Politics” could be defined as “emotional warfare that is made to look like it is government, falsely.”

Real government is the ACTUAL texts and ACTUAL inner-workings of the system. Politics is the FALSE REALITY made and broadcasted that does not mirror the ACTUAL operations of the system.

The government does not need a MONSTEROUS overhaul, in our opinion. A few solid tweaks and we will have a pretty solid commercial system.

12. Why don’t you use a title of nobility, such as “esquire,” like many lawyers do?

The term “esquire” was explicitly prohibited by the 13th Amendment. The use of the title of “esquire,” is an antagonistic jab that lawyers that operate in the foreign corporate Federal zone (District of Columbia) use against the unincorporated independent nation states of the United States of America.

The term “esquire” harkens back to our original desire to disconnect from England. It is viewed, erroneously, as a term of honor… but in actuality it is a term of combat. An “esquire” is an agent of the Crown. To be honest, we do not look at that idea as something necessarily negative at this point in time, but we simply do not use the term based out of a respect and adherence to the Constitution.

After the 14th amendment created the secondary citizenship type: Federal citizen (US citizen), it allowed the foreign lawyers to use the title “esquire” in the new incorporated zone.

Using titles of nobility in the unincorporated 50 original states is illegal and thus not something we will involve ourselves in. “Esquire” is a mark of an officer of the court.

13. Are you involved in various societal campaigns such as Black Lives Matter or climate change organizations, etc.

No. The concern of the Nation of The Amnesty Coalition is the basic education of words, terms and phrases. Our group and goals are ultimately an aspect of “social justice” in their own right. We feel that almost all groups, both on the “right” as well as the “left,” have way too many unspoken political prejudices.

Many of these groups breed hate and, regardless of the intent of the group itself, there is the apparent product of the group. Those products are visible and we will not permit those products to be excused away. We are not interested in banging on any particular “drum” or yelling and screaming for any particular “cause.” Even our desire to eliminate the 14th Amendment will be achieved through calm, fun education… not yelling, screaming and upset.

We simply want to be the greatest source of educational material available on the planet involving the subject of the definitions of words, terms and phrases. We will not be involving ourselves in various groups.

We are open allies of the micronation called Slowjamastan and the sultan’s application of 18 USC 11 is quite impressive in our eyes. We do promote the activities of Slowjamastan and Brandon Joe Williams is an Ambassador of Slowjamastan. You can view more information about the micronation of Slowjamastan at https://www.slowjamastan.org/. You can see pictures of myself with the Sultan and Chief Boarder Patrol in Slowjamastan down farther on this page.

We do not support any violent, angry or antagonistic groups, regardless of what they say they stand for. Even the antagonism found on www.onestupidfuck.com is all in good fun and is simply a style of engagement and branding. The PRODUCT of my faux antagonism is added fun and camaraderie in the group itself, not hate and anger. Our message is one of true peace and solidarity, not one of divisiveness and bloodshed.

To view more information about The Nation of The Amnesty Coalition, which is our foreign government arm of all my research, please visit https://www.theamnestycoalition.org.

14. Are you intending on creating an industry of people who are pro se litigants?

Oh yes, definitely. We intend on helping every single man or woman in the United States of America to operate pro se in the court systems. This is the true peaceful revolution that many have looked for and few have found. We will have a standing army of people who are excited to help the court systems enforce true law and order in our countries.

As a child you looked at the police, fire dept and other aspects of government through glory-washed eyes. You saw a superhero. You saw someone through the eyes of ideals that only the innocence of a child can muster.

Well, our desire to be superheroes has arrived. And we’re going to get rich in the process. Life really doesn’t get any better than this!

Even the BAR Cards and going to love this one. We’re the best marketing program they have ever seen because everyone that we are suing is going to run to them and this marketing doesn’t even cost them anything. So as much as we like to joke and jab at the BAR Cards, they love us.

There will be an entire free course that will be made and released on how to operate pro se. We will have that done as soon as possible and it will change the world. That course will be required learning for all pro se clients.

15. Why do some people complain over your use of “pro se” rather than terms like “sui juris”?

Because they do not know what persons are in play, they have a defense-centric mindset and because they either don’t litigate or have serious previous issues litigating. My platform is a strictly offense-centric mindset.

Our job is to navigate the complexities of litigation without creating too much of a tumultuous ride for ourselves. We are also VERY aggressive to be in the offensive position. We always want to sue first or counterclaim as rapidly and as aggressively as possible. Moving from the defensive position to the attacking position is always the number one concern for us at all times.

When you hear of people speaking about “how to get a case dismissed,” you need to realize that they are saying “I don’t have a clue” at the same time. Dismissal is the LAST thing you want. What you should be wanting and looking for is how to sink your teeth into them in the fastest and most effective way possible. You want your teeth clamped down on their flesh with such velocity that they wouldn’t be able to dismiss the case for all the money in the world.

When you sue first or rapidly counterclaim with as many causes of action that you can possibly muster, you place them on their backfoot. They should pay for having accosted you and from wasting your time. They should also pay for all the lies and fraud that all financial organizations have perpetrated on you and your loved ones.

This isn’t about revenge, this is about justice. This obsession to have cases “dismissed,” allows the bullies to continue their reign of terror unchecked. This is entirely unacceptable and we STRONGLY disagree with the idea of EVER dismissing a case. We would rather sue them before they can sue us, or counterclaim as rapidly and as aggressively as possible. This is the winning strategy! Walk away with a victory and also a ton of cash… never walk away empty handed!

16. Is it true that you are developing your own lexicon (vocabulary) for BAR Cards?

Oh yes, and this is the peak excitement in my life! The following terms are a part of our exciting new lexicon! I truly hope to see more and more usage of these terms in court cases used around both the united states of America and the United States! (please feel free to take and use these as much and as often as you want). I will add more here as we develop more terms.

Irrelevant billables - This term is in honor of how BAR Cards always produce so much irrelevant trash to file into the docket in an effort to bill their client their hourly fees. They will come up with all manner of worthless crap to file in to the case. They start talking about wild generalizations, crazy assumptions, ridicule, or anything else their creative billable-centric minds can come up with. Like starving animals… they become VERY resourceful!

The BAR Card Shuffle - This term is pretty similar to the above term and describes the wild writhing that a BAR Card does in an effort to try to deflect or upset the opposing counsel when they realize they have absolutely no clue about any real actual aspect of law and they have suddenly been jarred awake by a pro se litigant that is about to make them look like a real infant or person of unsound mind.

Hearsay for Hire - Means that most BAR Cards will say almost anything for a bit of cash.

17. Is Brandon or anyone else a CPA as well as attorney-in-fact?

Yes, Brandon is a CPA. But keep in mind that “CPA” typically means “Certified Public Accountant.” The word “Public” in that context means “government employee.” So I am a CPA but I am a Certified PRIVATE Accountant.